Cohabitation - should or should not in existentialism and egoism.

That's the subject we're being tested on today.

Well basically....according to existentialism, people only have to do what they think is correct at the time and place given. So, a person who at the time cannot afford to live on his or her own, should choose cohabitation as a way to save more living cost. But anyway, it's a different story after one suddenly won lottery or got a fab job - in this case it is no longer a wise decision, you know why. You earn the rice and he eats the rice. Clear? :P

Next, according to egoism, people must do what would bring benefits to oneself. Self-importance is larger than any other things. Hence, cohabitation is allowed in egoism, since a couple can get what is beneficial for them - the cost saving, the sex fulfilment (yeah well it's true what), the hormone balancing (consider some people who never get married and how they end up to be), etc etc. Therefore cohabitation is very well allowed in egoism.

Consequently, cohabitation is truly a wise decision, eh?. Seems to be. :P

By the way, oh well, i managed to screw sweet child thru - not bad eh, lol. And the zombie bass leading was like fcuk but not shit anymore - is that anything better? well....hope for better improvement next time!!

And aikz, still no nice secondhand bass in music master today i saw. SRX500 looks nice in youtube, think gotta ask the price.

Later gonna yum cha i guess?.....so that's all tonight! ciaoZ~